Air Jordan Horizon Women MBT Kimondo Men Nike Kyrie 2 MBT Kisumu Nike Magista II TF Timberland 6 Inch Boots Shoes Adidas Yeezy Boost 350 Women Air Jordan Jumpman Team II Men Air Jordan Reveal Men Nike Air Max Tailwind 7 Nike Magista Obra FG MBT Kisumu 2 Adidas Ace 16 Purecontrol Air Jordan 6 Air Jordan CP3 VIII Men MBT Kifundo Men Nike HypervenomX IC Nike Roshe Two Adidas Kaiser 5 FG Nike Air Jordan flight 45 Nike Air More Uptempo Men MBT Kimondo Gtx Men Nike Air Max Plus Txt Men Nike Roshe Two Flyknit Shoes Nike HypervenomX Proximo TF Adidas Kaiser 5 TF Air Jordan Flight 89 Nike Air Yeezy 2 Air Jordan 3.5 Homme Adidas John Wall 2 Homme MBT Flame Chaussures Nike Air Force 1 Homme's Chaussures Nike Air Max 90 Homme Nike Free Flyknit NSW Nike Roshe Run BR Nike ELASTICO Finale III Street TF Saucony Shadow 6000 Chaussures Timberland Chukka Boots Adidas Ultra Boost Adidas Climacool Fresh Bounce Adidas Originals NMD C1 Chaussures Adidas Stan Smith Primeknit Adidas Ace 16 FG Air Jordan Westbrook Herren MBT Fora Gtx Damen Nike Air Force 1 30th Herren Nike Air Max 95 Nike Free Inneva Woven Nike Roshe Run DMB Herren Timberland Classic Oxford Herren Adidas Originals NMD R1 Adidas Originals ZX 9000 Juice X Adidas Consortium Stan Smith Adidas Superstar 2 Schuhe Adidas Messi 16 FG Nike Air Max Motion LW Air Jordan 4 Adidas Ultra Boost Olympic Supra Bleeker Women Timberland 6 Inch Boots Nike Zoom Ascention Men MBT Kitabu Gtx Shoes Air Jordan 2 Men Adidas D Rose 7 Men MBT Baridi Women Nike Air Force 1 07 High Nike Air Huarache Men Adidas Climacool Boat Lace Adidas Neo Chaussures Adidas NMD Human Race Adidas Originals ZX 500 Adidas Originals Stan Smith W Adidas Originals Pride Pack Adidas 11 Pro TF Adidas Springblade Schuhe Adidas Tubular Schuhe Adidas Yeezy Boost 550 Adidas Originals ZX 8000 Nike Elastico Pro III IC Adidas Messi 16 AG Adidas Originals NMD Air Jordan 23 Air Jordan 3.5 Men Nike Air Max 2017 Adidas Original ZX Adidas Climacool Boat Nike Elastico Pro III IC Adidas Superstar 2 Shoes Nike Roshe Two Flyknit Shoes Adidas Stan Smith Adidas Ultra Boost Shoes MBT Fora Gtx Women Adidas Neo Timberland Chukka Boots Adidas NMD Nike Magista Obra IC MBT Lami Damen Adidas Messi 16.3 IC Timberland 6 Inch Boots Herren Nike ELASTICO Finale III Street TF Adidas NMD C1 Nike Air Max 2016

Research and presentations
For students
For lecturers
For researchers
Contact and feedback



RETTSPOSITIVISMEDEBATT [Debates on Legal Positivism]   1. utg. [1st ed.] pp. 169 + xiv. Oslo: Akademika forlag.


RETTSFILOSOFI [Philosophy of Law]   1. utg. [1st ed.] pp. 662 + xxx. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.


RETTSFILOSOFI [Philosophy of Law]   Foreløbig utg. [preliminary ed.] pp. 547 + xxii. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.


FORSKERSAMFUNN UTEN FAGFELLESSKAP? [Scientific Community without the Communality of Disciplines?]  pp. 108 + x. Institutt for Offentlig retts skriftserie. Oslo: Unipub.


ANALYSIS OF DIS/AGREEMENT – WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO LAW AND LEGAL THEORY   Transl. of Eng 1998. pp. 610 + xxi. Dordrecht-Boston-London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Links:  [Table of Contents]   [Preface]   [Chapter I Introduction]   [Chapter I↔V Conclusion]


U/ENIGHETSANALYSE – MED SÆRLIG SIKTE PÅ JUS OG ALLMENN RETTSTEORI   pp. 652 + xviii. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. English transl., see Eng 2003.



‘Why Reflective Equilibirum? I: Reflexivity of Justification’  (2014) 27 Ratio Juris, pp. 138–54.

  Links:  [Table of Contents]  [Abstract]

‘Why Reflective Equilibirum? II: Following Up on Rawls’s Comparison of His Own Approach with a Kantian Approach’  (2014) 27 Ratio Juris, pp. 288–310.

  Links:  [Table of Contents]  [Abstract]

‘Why Reflective Equilibirum? III: Reflective Equilibrium as a Heuristic Tool’  (2014) 27 Ratio Juris, pp. 440–59.

  Links:  [Table of Contents]  [Abstract]


‘ “Lovene spør ikke om beveggrunner.” Ibsen og Kant om handlingsmotivasjon og rett’ [‘ “The Laws Do Not Concern Themselves with Motives". Ibsen and Kant on the Motivation for an Act and the Law’]  In: H.P. Graver, I. Hjort Kraby, M. Stub (red.), Forsker og formidler. Festskrift til Erik Boe [Festschrift for Erik Boe], ss. 110–37. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. 2013.


‘Lost in the System or Lost in Translation? The Exchanges between Hart and Ross’  (2011) 24 Ratio Juris, pp. 194–246.

  Links:  [Table of Contents]   [Abstract]  


‘Kant om rettens videreføring: borgernes lydighetsplikt og de styrendes reformplikt’ [Kant on the Perpetuation of Law: the Duty of the Citizens to Obey and the duty of the Sovereign to Engage in Reform]  In: A. Leirfall and T. Sandmel (eds.), Enhet i mangfold [Unity in Diversity]. Festskrift til Johan Arnt Myrstad [Festschrift for Johan Arnt Myrstad], ss. 97–105. Unipub forlag: Oslo. 2009.


‘Fused Modality. An Integral Part of Lawyers' Form of Life’  (2005) 18 Ratio Juris, pp. 429–33.

‘Introduction to the ARSP-Volume: Law and Practice’  In: S. Eng (ed.), Proceedings of the 21st IVR World Congress, Lund, Part 2: Law and Practice, p. 1. Franz Steiner Verlag: Stuttgart. 2005.


‘Om studiet av tekster’ [On the Study of texts]  With Trond Skard Dokka. In: P. Ariansen m.fl. (eds.), Tekster i filosofi- og vitenskapshistorie [Texts from the History of Philosophy and Science], pp. 1–18. Department of Philosophy at the University of Oslo in cooperation with Unipub AS: Oslo. 2004.


‘Vitenskapelig rasjonalitet og studiet av tekster’ [Scientific Rationality and the Study of Texts]  With Trond Skard Dokka. In: O. Asheim/ E. Wiestad (eds.), Filosofi- og vitenskapshistorie [History of Philosophy and Science], pp. 287–325. Department of Philosophy at the University of Oslo in cooperation with Unipub AS: Oslo. 2003.


‘Legislative Inflation and the Quality of Law’  In: L. Wintgens (ed.), Legisprudence: A New Theoretical Approach to Legislation, pp. 65–80. Hart Publishing: Oxford. 2002.


‘Fusion of Descriptive and Normative Propositions. The Concepts of ‘Descriptive Proposition’ and ‘Normative Proposition’ as Concepts of Degree’  (2000) 13 Ratio Juris, pp. 236–60.

  Links:  [Abstract]   [The Paper]  

‘Does the Doctrine of Precedent Apply to Judicial Arguments Concerning the Doctrine of Sources of Law?’  In: W. Krawietz/ R.S. Summers/ O. Weinberger/ G.H. von Wright (eds.), The Reasonable as Rational? On Legal Argumentation and Justification. Festschrift for Aulis Aarnio, pp. 483–502. Duncker & Humblot: Berlin. 2000. Transl. of Eng 1997: ‘Får prejudikatslæren anvendelse ...’.

‘The Doctrine of Precedent in English and Norwegian Law – Some Common and Specific Features’  In: Scandinavian Studies in Law, Vol. 39: International Aspects, pp. 275–324. The Law Faculty at Stockholm University: Stockholm. 2000.


‘Criteria that are Used in the Setting up of and Choice between Descriptive Characterisations’  (1999) 18 Law and Philosophy, pp. 475–95.


‘Review of M. H. Andenæs, Rettskildelære [Doctrine of the Sources of Law]’  Heftet for Kritisk Juss 1998, pp. 275–78.


‘Får prejudikatlæren anvendelse på domsargumenter vedørende rettskildelæren?’ [Does the Doctrine of Precedent Apply to Judicial Arguments Concerning the Doctrine of Sources of Law?]  Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap 1997, pp. 21–44. English transl., see Eng 2000: ‘Does the Doctrine of Precedent Apply ...’.

‘Precedent in Norway’  In: N. MacCormick/ R. S. Summers (eds.), Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study, pp. 189–217. Ashgate and Dartmouth: Aldershot–Brookfield USA–Singapore–Sydney. 1997.

‘Departures from Precedent’  (with R. S. Summers). In: N. MacCormick/ R. S. Summers (eds.), Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study, pp. 519–30. Ashgate and Dartmouth: Aldershot–Brookfield USA–Singapore–Sydney. 1997.

‘Hidden Value-Choices in Legal Practice’  In: A. Aarnio/ R. Alexy/ G. Bergholtz (eds.), Festschrift for Aleksander Peczenik, pp. 123–45. Juristförlaget: Lund. 1997.

‘The Factual Effect of Judicial Decisions as a Source of Law: Either-Or Terminology Contrasted With Varieties of Bindingness – English and Norwegian Law as Test-Cases’  In: A. Leirfall/ T. Sandmel (eds.), Festschrift for Johan Arnt Myrstad, pp. 83–94. Tapir: Trondheim 1997.


‘La reale efficia delle decisioni guidiziarie come fonti del dritto: i casi inglese e norvegese’  Ragion pratica 1996/6, pp. 19–28. Transl. of Eng 1997.


‘ “Hva er en viljeserklæring?” Er det logisk umulig at disposisjonsvilje er begrepsmessig kjennetegn ved privatrettslig disposisjon?’ [“What Is a Declaration of Intent?” Is It Logically Impossible That the Will to Exercise Competence Be Part of the Concept of ‘Juristic Act’ in Private Law?]  Svensk Juristtidning 1993, pp. 1–42.


‘Teoristruktur og teorivalg’ [Theory Structure and Theory Choice]  Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap 1992, pp. 496–504.

‘Plassering av offentlig kompetanse hos private - noen hensyn for og imot’ [Public Powers Exercised by Private Legal Persons - Some Considerations For and Against]  Lov og Rett 1992, pp. 544–51.


‘Noen synspunkter på en teori om etikk, rett og erkjennelse’ [Some Views on a Theory of Ethics, Law and Cognition]  Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap 1991, pp. 279–305.


‘Begrepene ‘kompetanse’ og ‘gyldighet’ i juridisk argumentasjon’ [The Concepts of ‘Competencer’ and ‘Validity’ in Legal Argumentation]  Tidsskrift for rettsvitenskap 1990, pp. 625–71.

  Link:  [The Paper]  

‘Sondringen mellom regler og retningslinjer’ [The Distinction Between Rules and Guidelines]  In: N. Christie et al. (eds.), “... den urett som ikke rammer deg selv” – Festschrift for Anders Bratholm, pp. 473–83. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. 1990.